The company accounts for asset retirement obligations
(ARO) in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (FAS 143) and FASB Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations – An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (FIN 47). FAS 143
applies to the fair value of a liability for an ARO that is
recorded when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset and the liability can
be reasonably estimated. Obligations associated with the
retirement of these assets require recognition in certain circumstances:
(1) the present value of a liability and offsetting
asset for an ARO, (2) the subsequent accretion of that liability
and depreciation of the asset, and (3) the periodic review
of the ARO liability estimates and discount rates. FIN 47
clarifies that the phrase "conditional asset retirement obligation,"
as used in FAS 143, refers to a legal obligation to
perform asset retirement activity for which the timing and/or
method of settlement are conditional on a future event that
may or may not be within the control of the company. The
obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional
even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. Uncertainty
about the timing and/or method of settlement of a conditional ARO should be factored
into the measurement of the liability when sufficient
information exists. FAS 143 acknowledges that in some cases,
sufficient information may not be available to reasonably estimate
the fair value of an ARO. FIN 47 also clarifies when an
entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate
the fair value of an ARO.
FAS 143 and FIN 47 primarily affect the company's
accounting for crude oil and natural gas producing assets.
No significant AROs associated with any legal obligations to
retire refining, marketing and transportation (downstream)
and chemical long-lived assets have been recognized, as indeterminate
settlement dates for the asset retirements prevent
estimation of the fair value of the associated ARO. The company
performs periodic reviews of its downstream and chemical
long-lived assets for any changes in facts and circumstances
that might require recognition of a retirement obligation.
The following table indicates the changes to the company's
before-tax asset retirement obligations in 2008, 2007
and 2006:
|
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
| Balance at January 1 |
$8,253 |
$5,773 |
$4,304 |
| Liabilities incurred |
308 |
178 |
153 |
| Liabilities settled |
(973) |
(818) |
(387) |
| Accretion expense |
430 |
399* |
275 |
| Revisions in estimated cash flows |
1,377 |
2,721 |
1,428 |
| Balance at December 31 |
$9,395 |
$8,253 |
$5,773 |
In the table above, the amounts associated with “Revisions
in estimated cash flows” reflect increasing costs to abandon
onshore and offshore wells, equipment and facilities, including
an aggregate of $1,804 for 2006 through 2008 for the
estimated costs to dismantle and abandon wells and facilities
damaged by hurricanes in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in 2005
and 2008. The long-term portion of the $9,395 balance at the
end of 2008 was $8,588.