Show All

Global Strategic Workforce Development

Global Workforce at Year-End 2009

Global Workforce at Year-End 2009

Geographic breakdown

Pie chart displaying Global Workforce data
  • Bullet PointNorth America 47.9%
  • Bullet PointAsia-Pacific 26.6%
  • Bullet PointAfrica 13.8%
  • Bullet PointEurope/Middle East 8.4%
  • Bullet PointSouth America 3.3%

At year-end 2009, Chevron's worldwide staffing was 59,963 (excluding approximately 4,200 service station employees). This represents a decrease of 2.66 percent over the previous year. U.S. workers numbered 27,948, and approximately 14.3 percent were represented by unions.

Global Diversity

Global Diversity 2008 2009
Women in total workforce 22.7% 22.9%
Women represented at midlevel and above 11.5% 11.7%
Women and non-Caucasian men represented at senior executive level 24.8% 26.5%

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Statistics

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Statistics 2007 2008 2009
Minorities among total employees 33.9% 35.3% 34.9%
Women among total employees 29.0% 29.2% 28.9%
Minorities among executives and senior managers 9.6% 11.0% 11.2%
Minorities among first- and midlevel managers 26.5% 26.9% 27.5%
Women among executives and senior managers 14.1% 15.0% 14.4%
Women among first- and midlevel managers 25.6% 24.7% 27.4%
Minorities among professionals 29.1% 30.6% 31.4%
Women among professionals 32.0% 32.4% 32.4%

Health & Safety

Total Recordable Incident Rate

Total Recordable Incident Rate

Incidents per 200,000 work hours

Bar chart displaying Total Recordable Incident Rate per 200,000 work hours
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
American Petroleum Institute's Benchmarking Survey of Occupational Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities in the Petroleum Industry data are used as industry benchmarks. 2009 benchmark data were not available at the time of publication.
Workforce 0.41 0.42 0.35 0.36 0.27
Benchmark 0.84 0.59 0.56 0.55 N/A
Employees 0.38 0.34 0.40 0.31 0.32
Benchmark 0.61 0.51 0.49 0.47 N/A
Contractors 0.42 0.46 0.34 0.37 0.26
Benchmark 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.59 N/A

Work-Related Fatalities

Work-Related Fatalities

Bar chart displaying Work-Related Fatalities
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Workforce 6 12 17 5 9
Employees 2 1 3 0 0
Contractors 4 11 14 5 9

Days Away From Work Rate

Days Away From Work Rate

Incidents per 200,000 work hours

Bar chart displaying Days Away From Work per 200,000 work hours
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
American Petroleum Institute's Benchmarking Survey of Occupational Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities in the Petroleum Industry data are used as industry benchmarks. 2009 benchmark data were not available at the time of publication.
Workforce 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05
Benchmark 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 N/A
Employees 0.16 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.07
Benchmark 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.11 N/A
Contractors 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.04
Benchmark 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.13 N/A

Lost-Time Incident Frequency

Lost-Time Incident Frequency

Incidents per million work hours

Bar chart displaying Lost-Time Incident Frequency Rate per million work hours
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
American Petroleum Institute's Benchmarking Survey of Occupational Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities in the Petroleum Industry data are used as industry benchmarks. 2009 benchmark data were not available at the time of publication.
Workforce 0.60 0.50 0.37 0.27 0.25
Benchmark 0.78 0.72 0.65 0.64 N/A
Employees 0.84 0.41 0.48 0.33 0.33
Benchmark 0.77 0.64 0.57 0.57 N/A
Contractors 0.49 0.53 0.33 0.25 0.23
Benchmark 0.79 0.78 0.71 0.67 N/A

Motor Vehicle Safety

Motor Vehicle Safety

Bar chart displaying Motor Vehicle Safety

2006 2007 2008 2009
Data include catastrophic, major and serious incidents.
Bullet Point Company motor vehicle incidents per million miles driven 0.82 0.82 0.75 0.74

Climate Change

GHG Emissions by Source

GHG Emissions by Source

Millions of metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Bar chart displaying GHG Emissions by Source
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Chevron's net decrease of approximately 2.2 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions from 2008 to 2009 can be attributed to reduced flaring from Cabinda (Angola), and to Nigerian gas processing shutdowns, shut-in offshore wells and pipeline vandalism. Production decreases at U.S. Midcontinent and Alaska operations, as well as declining demand for products and shutdown of process units at the Richmond, California, refinery, also accounted for the emission reductions. Decreases were offset by increased emissions due to increased production at Tengiz, Kazakhstan, and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (particularly resulting from Blind Faith and Tahiti fields' coming onstream), and due to the increased throughput from the Pembroke, United Kingdom, refinery.

Chevron's GHG emissions data are reported on an equity basis for all businesses in which Chevron has an interest except as noted below. The following entities are not currently included in the Chevron corporate greenhouse gas inventory: Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, Azerbaijan International Operating Co., the Chad/Cameroon pipeline joint venture, Caltex Australia Ltd.'s Lytton and Kurnell refineries, and other refineries in which Chevron has an equity interest of 16 percent or less. These are entities over which Chevron does not have full operational control or which do not generally follow Chevron's corporate GHG inventory protocol or a compatible protocol.

Due to rounding, individual numbers may not sum to the total numbers.

Millions of metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Bullet PointCombustion 37.9 39.8 41.0 41.2 40.3
Bullet PointFlaring and venting 14.9 16.4 14.6 13.6 12.5
Bullet PointOther 6.0 5.3 4.8 4.8 4.6

GHG Emissions by Sector

GHG Emissions by Sector

Millions of metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Bar chart displaying GHG Emissions by Sector
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Chevron's net decrease of approximately 2.2 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions from 2008 to 2009 can be attributed to reduced flaring from Cabinda (Angola), and to Nigerian gas processing shutdowns, shut-in offshore wells and pipeline vandalism. Production decreases at U.S. Midcontinent and Alaska operations, as well as declining demand for products and shutdown of process units at the Richmond, California, refinery, also accounted for the emission reductions. Decreases were offset by increased emissions due to increased production at Tengiz, Kazakhstan, and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (particularly resulting from Blind Faith and Tahiti fields' coming onstream), and due to the increased throughput from the Pembroke, United Kingdom, refinery.

Chevron's GHG emissions data are reported on an equity basis for all businesses in which Chevron has an interest except as noted below. The following entities are not currently included in the Chevron corporate greenhouse gas inventory: Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, Azerbaijan International Operating Co., the Chad/Cameroon pipeline joint venture, Caltex Australia Ltd.'s Lytton and Kurnell refineries, and other refineries in which Chevron has an equity interest of 16 percent or less. These are entities over which Chevron does not have full operational control or which do not generally follow Chevron's corporate GHG inventory protocol or a compatible protocol.

Due to rounding, individual numbers may not sum to the total numbers.

Millions of metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Bullet PointUpstream 35.6 37.1 36.0 34.7 32.3
Bullet PointDownstream 22.1 23.2 22.8 23.5 24.0
Bullet PointOther 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.1

Total GHG Emissions by Type

Total GHG Emissions by Type1 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

1. Chevron's net decrease of approximately 2.2 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions from 2008 to 2009 can be attributed to reduced flaring from Cabinda (Angola), and to Nigerian gas processing shutdowns, shut-in offshore wells and pipeline vandalism. Production decreases at U.S. Midcontinent and Alaska operations, as well as declining demand for products and shutdown of process units at the Richmond, California, refinery, also accounted for the emission reductions. Decreases were offset by increased emissions due to increased production at Tengiz, Kazakhstan, and in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (particularly resulting from Blind Faith and Tahiti fields' coming onstream), and due to the increased throughput from the Pembroke, United Kingdom, refinery.

Chevron's GHG emissions data are reported on an equity basis for all businesses in which Chevron has an interest except as noted below. The following entities are not currently included in the Chevron corporate greenhouse gas inventory: Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, Azerbaijan International Operating Co., the Chad/Cameroon pipeline joint venture, Caltex Australia Ltd.'s Lytton and Kurnell refineries, and other refineries in which Chevron has an equity interest of 16 percent or less. These are entities over which Chevron does not have full operational control or which do not generally follow Chevron's corporate GHG inventory protocol or a compatible protocol.

Due to rounding, individual numbers may not sum to the total numbers.

2. Direct emissions come from sources within a facility. Indirect emissions come from electricity and steam Chevron imports, less the emissions credits from electricity and steam Chevron exports. Grid credits account for the electricity Chevron exports that is produced more efficiently than electricity from the regional or national grid.

Millions of metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Direct2 62.3 65.4 63.8 63.0 60.8
Indirect2 -2.7 -3.0 -2.9 -2.2 -2.4
Grid Credits2 -0.7 -0.9 -0.5 -1.2 -0.9
Net 58.8 61.5 60.4 59.6 57.4

Energy Efficiency Performance

Energy Efficiency Performance

Percentage improvement since 1992 baseline

Bar chart displaying Energy Efficiency Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
24% 27% 27% 28% 30%

Environmental Management

Global Emissions to Air

Global Emissions to Air1,2,3

Metric tons

Bar chart displaying Global VOCs Emissions to Air
VOCs 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Bullet PointUpstream 445,049 357,727 240,716 201,209 225,949
Bullet PointDownstream 23,442 26,100 18,788 18,648 39,630
Bullet PointOther 212 87 1,136 1,878 240
Bar chart displaying Global SOx Air Emissions
SOx 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Bullet PointUpstream 87,455 82,922 63,223 97,731 125,520
Bullet PointDownstream 23,986 25,574 20,451 18,496 15,997
Bullet PointOther 7,433 9,714 7,970 8,810 536
Bar chart displaying Global NOx Emissions to Air
NOx 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

1. We improve our methodology and scope for reporting global emissions to air annually, making year-to-year comparisons difficult. Our focus is to continually improve our reporting practices.

2. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derive primarily from fugitive emissions from equipment (such as valves, pumps and compressors), flaring and venting, and flashing gas. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur oxides (SOx) occur during combustion.

3. During 2009, improvements in estimation methodologies in several reporting units resulted in variances in reported emissions compared with 2008.

Global VOC emissions were higher than in 2008 primarily due to the Nigeria/Mid-Africa business unit's improved estimation of vented gas volumes, the Eurasia business unit's replacement of default emissions factors with locally specified data, and Global Marketing's estimation of storage tank and loading emissions for the first time. This gain was partially offset by reductions due to improved reporting by the Asia South business unit and decreased production in Alaska, United States.

Global SOx emissions were higher than in 2008, mainly due to the Eurasia business unit's improved reporting and to the Partitioned Zone (between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait) business unit's increased sour gas production and improved reporting of gas production and flaring..

Global NOx emissions were lower than in 2008, mainly due to improved reporting by the IndoAsia business unit and the completion in 2008 of a drilling program at Indonesia geothermal and power operations.

U.S. Refining (Manufacturing) data on emissions to air are no longer additionally reported separately, as this report is enterprisewide and global in nature.

Global Gas, previously reported as "other," was included with Upstream in 2009. "Other" includes Chemicals, Chevron Business and Real Estate Services, Chevron Mining Inc., Chevron Environmental Management Co., and Corporate Aviation.

Due to rounding, individual numbers may not sum to the total numbers.

Bullet PointUpstream 97,829 113,001 121,378 95,717 110,068
Bullet PointDownstream 15,837 16,020 14,041 12,282 12,133
Bullet PointOther 8,250 9,083 9,257 26,785 711

Petroleum Spills by Volume

Petroleum Spills by Volume

Volume in barrels

Color key for Petroleum Spills Bar chart displaying petroleum spills by volume measured in barrels
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Secondary containment volume — which is not released to the environment — is included in the total volume listed at the end of each bar. Approximately 14 percent, or 1,289 barrels, of the total volume was spilled to secondary containment in 2009.

All spills to water are included. Spills to land and secondary containment that are greater than or equal to one barrel are included.

Volume in barrels
Bullet PointTotal 47,934 6,099 9,245 17,492 9,368
Bullet PointRecovered 11,202 3,923 6,920 14,399 7,512

Petroleum Spills by Number

Petroleum Spills 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

All spills to water are included. Spills to land and secondary containment that are greater than or equal to one barrel are included.

Number of spills 846 803 826 760 798

Average Oil Concentration in Discharges to Water

Average Oil Concentration in Discharges to Water

Parts per million

Bar chart displaying average oil concentration in discharges to water measured by parts per million
2006 2007 2008 2009

Global Upstream average oil concentration in discharges to water decreased in 2009, mainly due to additional well-injection capacity, which allowed the Partitioned Zone business unit to cease discharging produced water as of June 2009. Manufacturing and Chemicals average oil concentration in discharges to water increased, mainly due to a process upset and wastewater-treatment maintenance issues at our Pascagoula, Mississippi, refinery. A new effluent treatment plant at Pascagoula came fully on line in November 2009.

Parts per million
Bullet PointUpstream 32.03 15.64 12.94 11.28
Bullet PointManufacturing and chemicals 4.51 3.70 3.73 3.87

Updated: May 2010

2009 Corporate
Responsibility Report

Corporate Responsibility Report 2009

Download Report

Request a Printed Copy