References
- 1 U.S. Department of Energy, Model Year 1999 Fuel Economy Guide, DOE/EE-0178, October 1998.
- 2 Oscar Pinkus and Donald F. Wilcock, The Role of Tribology in Energy Conservation, Lubrication Engineering, 34 (11), pp. 599-610.
- 3 U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Improving Automobile Fuel Economy: New Standards, New Approaches, OTA-E-504 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, October 1991); Chapter 3: Where Does Improved Fuel Efficiency Come From?
- 4 Ibid., p. 26.
- 5 Wilfried J. Barz, Potential Savings by Fuel-Economy Engine and Transmission Oils, Paper No. 911697, Society of Automotive Engineers, September 1991.
- 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources, Fuel Economy Impact Analysis of RFG, EPA 420-F-95-003, Washington, D.C., August 1995.
- 7 Albert M. Hochhauser, et al., Fuel Composition Effects on Automotive Fuel Economy – Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program, Paper No. 930138, Society of Automotive Engineers, March 1993.
- 8 U.S. EPA, Fuel Economy Impact Analysis.
- 9 California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, California Reformulated Gasoline: Performance and Compatibility Test Program, March 1996.
- 10 Kevin Carabell and Randy Barber, Real World Fleet Test of a Prototypical California Phase 2 RFG, Paper No. 961223, Society of Automotive Engineers, May 1996.
- 11 Oral communication.
- 12 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, On-Road Study of the Effects of Reformulated Gasoline on Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy in Southeastern Wisconsin, March 1995.
- 13 Tracy A. Kellner, et al., Comprehensive Laboratory Fuel Economy Testing with RFG and Conventional Fuels, Paper No. 960855, Society of Automotive Engineers, May 1996.
Return to "Fuel Economy of Gasoline Vehicles"
Return to "Technical & Safety Bulletins"