Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a global issue that requires global engagement and action.
Greenhouse gases (GHGs) do not recognize sovereign borders. Climate change risks stem from the cumulative effect of GHG emissions from all nations. By 2040, about one-quarter of global energy-related GHG emissions are projected to come from OECD* nations and three-quarters from non-OECD nations, the single largest being China, alone accounting for nearly one-quarter of projected global energy-related GHG emissions. With emissions rising fastest in developing countries, climate change risks cannot be addressed by actions taken in the developed world alone. Global engagement is required. Unilateral action by any country or jurisdiction could result in unintended consequences that could distort markets, reduce competitiveness of trade-exposed industries and undermine intended environmental objectives – without reducing climate change risks to that country or jurisdiction.
*The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
balanced and measured approach
Policies should be balanced and measured to ensure long-term economic, environmental and energy security needs are all met, costs are allocated in an equitable, gradual and predictable way and actions consider both GHG mitigation and climate change adaptation.
Access to affordable, reliable energy is essential to the growth of strong economies, sustained improvements in the quality of life, and the eradication of poverty. To ensure these benefits for today’s and future generations alike, GHG reduction and climate change adaptation objectives must balance the need for economic growth, environmental stewardship and energy security.
How the costs of these actions are shared is equally important. GHGs are a function of many activities, from manufacturing, agriculture and transport, to supply the world with essential food, goods and services, to how much energy we use to power our homes, drive our cars and otherwise travel for work and leisure.
To reduce GHG emissions while avoiding disruptive economic and social impacts, policies must be developed that allow for multiple solutions, reasonable timeframes for the turnover of infrastructure, equitable sharing of costs across carbon-emitting sectors of the economy and efficient allocation of capital. Markets allocate limited capital in the most efficient and effective way when there are no large-scale subsidies for energy consumption or energy production.
Addressing climate change risks in a meaningful way is a complex, long-term proposition. Along the way and as knowledge evolves, climate change policies require periodic assessment to determine if the intended results are being achieved, if costs and actions are being shared equitably, if global development and economic growth continue, and if energy remains affordable to global consumers.
research, innovation and application of technology
Continued research, innovation and application of technology are essential to enable significant and cost-effective mitigations to climate change risks over the long term.
There are large-scale, proven and affordable technologies available today that can be applied to lower or reduce the growth of global GHGs. Natural gas, energy efficiency, and nuclear technologies can be implemented immediately to help reduce GHG emissions while innovative research continues. This also may include unsubsidized wind energy in jurisdictions where large-scale development can be achieved. Government must enable the development and application of these energy technologies by removing barriers to access, streamlining permitting and ensuring responsible and cost-effective regulation.
Energy efficiency is the most immediate and cost-effective source of “new” energy with no GHG emissions. In addition to government support of energy efficiency efforts, the private sector should increase its own efforts to enhance efficiency in everything from manufacturing and transportation to building management and construction.
Innovative technologies are created and developed through free markets, university rese arch, government investment, public-private partnership, entrepreneurial venture capital start-ups, and industrial and individual application of new technologies. The development of multiple solutions and pathways will require sufficient time for government and industry to learn from and to apply the outcomes of the research.
Research, development and deployment of technology should be focused on cost-effective climate change adaptation measures and breakthroughs needed to deliver affordable, lower carbon energy solutions that can be adopted globally, at scale and without subsidies. Associated government policies should be technology neutral and support early stage pre-commercial activity to advance needed technology and cost breakthroughs. Continued global research on climate science is also critically important to further our understanding of the complex relationship between GHG emissions and climate and narrow the uncertainty in predictive models.
Policies that enable these dynamic aspects of science, research, innovation and application of technology to address scale, cost and technological barriers will advance the most cost-effective solutions to climate change risks.
The costs, risks, trade-offs and uncertainties associated with GHG reduction and climate change adaptation efforts and policies must be transparent and openly communicated to global consumers.
Developing solutions of the scale required by the climate change challenge will be a complex endeavor. It is essential to understand and fully communicate the economic and social costs of various policies and the projected environmental benefits, both in the near term and the long term, so we can agree on solutions that are fair, balanced, effective and affordable to global consumers.